Winning isnt really winning- it's failing to fail.

When most people think of winning, they think of the skill of the sportsman, or team, in competition against their peers.
That level of skill is often physically matched, so the difference is shown in the mental preparation, or determination, a willingness to beat the other team, by doing those '1%-ers' required to gain an edge.
So often the success, or failure is measured in centimeters, or milliseconds, or some other very small margin of difference between the combatants.
However, in the startup game, it's something else entirely.

Here, your competition isn't really your competition. Your ability to do things 1% better may not be ever be recognised, valued or even make a difference. A coder who is 1% better than his peers, may not be as politically savvy, or as good at extolling his virtues. I'm not suggesting that the aggregate results of doing things better isn't required -it's just that it not the difference between failure and success in our world.
For example, from my experience in startups so far, a brilliant idea, a 'perfect pitch', a well-oiled team, a valid proof of concept, early market traction, or even that successful elusive 'series A' funding round, are no guarantees to ultimate market success.
Here, its something much less well defined; its more akin to the solo yatchsmen that circumnavigate the globe; they keep trying, again & again, despite weather, equipment failure, adversity, fatigue, capsizing etc., until they acheive their goal. You often hear hear of them succeeding after many attempts.

This type of winning could be more aptly described as 'failing to fail', and is much closer to what you & I do perhaps every day.
Leni Mayo (of 99 Designs fame) described it best when he recently floated the concept to me that that the normal entrepreneur (I avoid the word average here) has attempted 8 startups before they get something to fly. (He also joked to me that he lucked out on his 2nd.)
Unfortunately, too many give up before that stage.

So if the game isn't you against the world, what is it really? I believe that the real game is 'you against yourself'.

• How big is your vision?
• What lengths are you prepared to go to, in order to make it a reality? 
• How many stones are you prepared to turn over? 
• How uncomfortable are you willing to get? 
• How much more are prepared to stretch, to strive, to reach? 
• How hard will you push yourself? 
• What pain are you willing to endure in the pursuit of your vision?
• How many times will you get up after you get knocked-down?

Did you notice that none of these mention or even consider competition? No, the real game is 'you'.  If you doubt me still, let me ask you three final questions.

If not 'this', then what? 
If not 'now', then when? 
If not 'you', then who? 
So stay in the game, keep striving, keep reaching, keep failing, and most importantly, keep getting back up, until you fail at failing.  
Then everyone can call you an 'overnight success'.